Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
五面獎牌在手——週六還有機會再添一金——她已成為奧運史上獎牌最多的女子自由式滑雪選手。
，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts direct to your inbox
Check whether you already have access via your university or organisation.