Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
2024年12月23日 星期一 新京报，更多细节参见Safew下载
（十三）剪接、删改、损毁、丢失办理治安案件的同步录音录像资料的；。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读
当杜耀豪把家族老照片发去，屏幕那头传来确认，这就是他们的亲戚。，更多细节参见快连下载安装
Fin Costello/Redferns/Getty Images