I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
// console.log(spanner.next(80)); // 输出1（正确）。业内人士推荐同城约会作为进阶阅读
，详情可参考WPS下载最新地址
Unicode ships one confusable map. You need two.。同城约会对此有专业解读
"I've always been adventurous and interested in finding the most wild places," says McKenzie, speaking to the BBC via a satellite-connected video call.